« Lecture at RMIT Melbourne Weds 5th Sept | Blog home | CoCo Seminar Weds 12 Sep »

business learning training articles new learning business training opportunities finance learning training deposit money learning making training art loan learning training deposits make learning your training home good income learning outcome training issue medicine learning training drugs market learning money training trends self learning roof training repairing market learning training online secure skin learning training tools wedding learning training jewellery newspaper learning for training magazine geo learning training places business learning training design Car learning and training Jips production learning training business ladies learning cosmetics training sector sport learning and training fat burn vat learning insurance training price fitness learning training program furniture learning at training home which learning insurance training firms new learning devoloping training technology healthy learning training nutrition dress learning training up company learning training income insurance learning and training life dream learning training home create learning new training business individual learning loan training form cooking learning training ingredients which learning firms training is good choosing learning most training efficient business comment learning on training goods technology learning training business secret learning of training business company learning training redirects credits learning in training business guide learning for training business cheap learning insurance training tips selling learning training abroad protein learning training diets improve learning your training home security learning training importance

As featured in the Australian, in a school in the US, students are tested each week in maths and reading, and, depending on their grade level, in science and social studies too. In addition they also have an "interim assessment" every six weeks, with tests on the all the material covered in the previous weeks and in the earlier part of the term. By the end of the school year, the tests are long and cover a vast range of material. The tests arm the teachers with information about what the students are learning or struggling with, and allow them to plan intervention when students fall behind, and share techniques that work. They call it data-driven teaching.

My first thought: Poor students! And poor teachers. While pitched as a positive development ("Data-driven decision making" for schools), it can also be interpreted as not trusting teachers' professional judgement anymore: Why are teachers' observations on students' performance in class disregarded as "data"? And shouldn't we be concerned about the time spend on testing rather than learning? If we follow the general argument of "only test data are valid data" for schools, then why not test everyday? Indeed, after every hour?

There is more than enough research, one would think, that demonstrates the potentially disastrous effects of testing on motivation and epistemological cognition. And as we know, whenever there is formal testing, there will be potentially high-stakes decisions. The combination of the two has demonstrable negative effects on the individual, school, and system level. (See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksqkY_jgDhk for a summary of the arguments.)

We don't need more of this kind of testing in classrooms. What we need more of in schools is authentic assessment, assessment that serves a pedagogical function, and assessment that is unobtrusive (does not take away time from more meaningful things.) That's what I try to contribute in my own work, see http://www.next-tell.eu.

About the Blog

Research by the University's Centre for Research on Learning and Innovation (CRLI).