« Zotero: endnote for e-research? | Blog home | CALL FOR PAPERS: Fifth International East Nusantara Conference »

business learning training articles new learning business training opportunities finance learning training deposit money learning making training art loan learning training deposits make learning your training home good income learning outcome training issue medicine learning training drugs market learning money training trends self learning roof training repairing market learning training online secure skin learning training tools wedding learning training jewellery newspaper learning for training magazine geo learning training places business learning training design Car learning and training Jips production learning training business ladies learning cosmetics training sector sport learning and training fat burn vat learning insurance training price fitness learning training program furniture learning at training home which learning insurance training firms new learning devoloping training technology healthy learning training nutrition dress learning training up company learning training income insurance learning and training life dream learning training home create learning new training business individual learning loan training form cooking learning training ingredients which learning firms training is good choosing learning most training efficient business comment learning on training goods technology learning training business secret learning of training business company learning training redirects credits learning in training business guide learning for training business cheap learning insurance training tips selling learning training abroad protein learning training diets improve learning your training home security learning training importance

It was a perfect cool and sunny Canberra afternoon. Some of the Wednesday Lunch Linguists wanted to avoid spending it on marking. And so we headed off to Peter Bellwood's seminar at ANU, Early farmers and the spread of languages in South Asia. This was partly based on a paper he gave at the Harvard Kyoto Roundtable in 2005 [1]. Prehistorians can tell grand stories, and this was grand by their standards - wheat, barley, rice and the linguistic history of the whole of India and Pakistan.

Bellwood painted a picture of Indo-Aryans sweeping into northern India from Iran with cattle, domesticated cereals, mother goddess figurines, and copper technology from about 3500 BC. But not as horse-mounted hordes. Dravidians came in about the same time but from slightly further south, with Neolithic technology, cereals (no wheat or barley) and they developed cattle corrals. And about 3000 BC Munda speakers came in from the east, with rice-cultivation techniques and cord-marking pottery that resembles that found in China.

The basic lines of argument are that if we want to explain the distribution of language families, then we have to consider that:
2. People move, languages don't move (much... people need a reason to shift languages), and scatterings of language families means the ancestors of the speakers must have moved to different places.
3. People need a reason to move. Conquerors, world religions, colonialism are all irrelevant in these early moves.
4. In the material culture record in India there are differences: lots of Neolithic sites in Dravidian heartlands, copper in Indo-Aryan areas, corded pottery in possible Munda areas, and so on. And there are dates for the appearance of different cereals in different areas. Rice came from India, wheat and barley from West Asia.
5. So Bellwood links speakers with technologies and farming techniques, and thus the spread of these, and direction of spread, with the spread of the language families. He didn't spell it out, but I suppose the assumption is that hunter gatherer peoples don't learn farming techniques unless a whole bunch of farmers moves in, and in that case they might as well learn the farmers' language as well.
6. This results in much earlier dates for Indo-Aryan than linguists usually give (ours are often linked with the hypothesised composition of the Rig-Veda ca 1500 BC).
7. So in Bellwood's view, if you have evidence of material culture change, and of language family spread, then you try to link the one with the other. Thus the approach ignores the possibility of spread of languages by hunter-gatherers, because there is little material culture evidence that could be used to prove or disprove such a hypothesised spread.

The upshot for linguists is that Bellwood's hypothesis makes it important to reconstruct terminology sets for the relevant material culture and farming and pastoralism technologies for the language families. Do the Munda languages share obviously old words for rice? But it also forces us to think about what the reasons could be for language spread in hunter gather societies, such as pre-colonial Australia, and where one would look for evidence for to prove or disprove them.

[1] BELLWOOD, PETER. 2006. Early farmers: issues of spread and migration with respect to the Indian subcontinent. Proceedings of the Pre-symposium of RIHN and 7th ESCA Harvard-Kyoto Roundtable, ed. by Osada Toshiki and Noriko Hase, 58-72. Kyoto: Research Institute for Humanity and Nature.

Comments

Good stuff. Jane is doing us all a service here. But I infer from her account that she feels Bellwood is inserting, perhaps even justifying, methodological bias in favour of agriculture, and against the random walks of hunter-gatherers. Indeed, if people had such a good life in the uncluttered days of HG-ing, perhaps they would have time and motivation to indulge a spirit of adventure, and just head off over the horizon, whenever the spirit moved them. The agriculturalists, after all, are settlers by nature - usually, at least for a year at a time.

I bet it was not the spirit, but thirst, hunger and quarrels with the family that often were the main motivators. But there's something inspiring about Warlpiri people's enthusiasm: 'Let's get moving, let's go to fresh country.'

Methodologically - yes- since we need explanations for why there are language families across the hunter gatherer societies of Australia, similar explanations could have accounted for spreads of languages in South Asia before the arrival of agriculture.

I've never understood the "people move, languages don't move" argument. It's clearly not right as a universal, or at best vastly simplistic. For example, there was a 6,000 year old peat bog man found in the West of England with enough DNA preserved to test for descendants, and a great match was found in the village a mile from the swamp! Now no one claims that English was spoken in Cheshire 6,000 years ago.. How about the Damara(Ethnic Bantus who speak Khoekhoegowab)? It's not at all clear to me that "languages don't move" is a viable general principle. After all, population movement is also a complex business...

"Now no one claims that English was spoken in Cheshire 6,000 years ago..." Don't be too sure of that. Certainly something like that is implicit in Oppenheimer 2006 - see
http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7817
and http://www.amazon.co.uk/Origins-British-Genetic-Detective-Story/dp/1845291581/sr=1-1/qid=1163682552/ref=sr_1_1/026-7535216-9574055?ie=UTF8&s=books
and indeed, when you come to think about it, there's no reason that Germanic speakers should have been less sea-faring between Ice Age and Roman conquest than the Celts.

Yeah, except we have evidence from Tacitus, etc, that that area was Celtic-speaking in the meantime.

You ask for written evidence, from Tacitus, that these people were Celtic-speaking? I can't speak for Cheshire specifically (perhaps the area of the Cornovii) but in their brief comments on the British, both Julius Caesar and Tacitus note a significant difference in type between coastal and inland British populations. Julius Caesar writes (de Bello Gallico, v.12)
"The interior of Britain is inhabited by those of whom they say the tradition is that they they were indigenous to the island; the coastlands by people who had crossed from the Belgae’s territory for plunder and war; almost all these tribes kept their original names when they settled down after the war…"
As to the Belgae, Caesar had also remarked (de Bello Gallico, ii.4):
"When Caesar asked the Remi what states were under arms, their power and military capabilities, he was told that most of the Belgae were of German origin, and having early crossed the Rhine, had settled there on account of the richness of the land, and had expelled the Gaulish inhabitants…"
Tacitus adds (Agricola xi):
"Who were the original inhabitants of Britain, whether indigenous or foreign, is as usual among barbarians, little known… The red hair and large limbs of Caledonians (in modern Scotland) indicate a German origin. The dark complexion of the Silures, their usually curly hair … are evidence that Iberians anciently crossed over to settle here. Those who live nearest to the Gauls are also like them… The language differs but little."
No ancient author recognized the major linguistic divide between Gaulish and Germanic languages, so this last could be taken as evidence that Belgae in Britain’s south-east spoke a Germanic language, like their cousins on the continent. In the absence of almost any written evidence in the languages spoken by the non-Roman population, we must accept that the invaders could have found already sizeable Germanic, i.e. proto-English, communities settled in the eastern and southern parts of the island, and perhaps even further north.

Thanks Nick, I was remembering Latin classes from the rapidly retreating past.
But even if there were "Proto-English" speakers before the Roman conquest, 6,000 years ago is much earlier (but several thousands of years) than one would normally date proto-Germanic to, let alone a proto-English.

Agreed. You were talking 6000 years, and I 3000 at the outside. But who knows what could have happened in those previous 3000 - perhaps as full of complex event (if undocumented) as the partly recorded history of the latter 3000? Ignoratio elenchi strikes again. Ironically, I'd have thought that your palaeo-Australian expertise would give more insight than Europe can into peoples' and languages' movement or permanence in that sort of long term. But it doesn't take such long-term examples to make your original point: the ancestors of all Romance-speaking western Europe (except Latium) were speaking something different as recently as 2500 years ago. Roman soldiers and matrons can't be the only ancestors of every continental Western European. So I think it's quite clear that some languages do move, above and beyond errant populations.

John Raciti's Belgae Modal: Gallo-Belgic (Bello Gallico)

http://www.geocities.com/johnraciti2/dna/dna_R1b.html

Gallic-Belgae - Belgae - The Belgae shown in south central England were related to the Belgium tribes on the continent. These peoples are believed to have crossed the channel about 75 BC. The most numerous tribe of the Belgae in Britannia at the time Agricola was governor (78-84 AD) were the Catuvallauni. The Catuvallauni of Britannia had skirmished with Julius Caesar in 55 and 54 BC when Caesar raided southern Britannia to punish the tribes aiding their kin on the continent as Caesar conquered Gaul.

I am a Dravidian and I speak two Dravidian languages fluently and other two I can understand. I felt a lot of similarity between Dravidian languages and Indigenous languages and also their culture and beliefs.

Re:Detective work solves a genetic mystery
http://www.usyd.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=490

My Story:

Subject: Belgae DNA Modal & Nordic-Celtic Project

Belgae DNA Modal & Nordic-Celtic Project

I have come up we this - Belgae DNA Modal through my Nordic-Celtic DNA project (1008 members).

http://www.ysearch.org/lastname_view.asp?
uid=&letter=&lastname=Belgae&viewuid=AX6GA&p=0

http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Nordic-Celtic

Investigating the contribution that archaeology has made to accounts of human evolution

Accounts of human evolution usually revolve around well-publicised discoveries of the bony remains of our ancestors. These do allow us to piece together our family tree and to paint - at least in broad outline - a picture of the ancestors who appear on that tree. But it is the archaeological record that preserves actual traces of our ancestors' activities and intuition suggests that these ought to be fundamental to our accounts of human evolution. However, this is far from being the case and this project is designed to explore why this is so.

This is a link to my Research:

http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Nordic-Celtic

My research looks at - to what degree of social assimilation occurred between native European groups of people throughout the history of Australia and the western world - through dna?

The focus of the project is to gather a representation of evidence and interest in Native Scandinavians and Native Celtic-Iberians found in ‘all’ parts of Australia and where we came from Europe.

[...] 27, 2008 by Gershom Gorenberg To continue a conversation with Haim about politics and physics: Faux pas, shmaux pas. In physics, action and reaction refer to motion. In Israeli-Palestinian relations, [...]

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Enter the code shown below before pressing post

The Authors

About the Blog

The Transient Building, symbolising the impermanence of language, houses both the Linguistics Department at Sydney University and PARADISEC, a digital archive for endangered Pacific languages and music.
More

FAQ

Papua New Guinea FAQs from Eva Lindstrom Papua New Guinea (New Ireland): Eva Lindstrom's tips for fieldworkers

Australian Languages Answers to some frequently asked questions about Australian languages

Papua Web Information network on Papua, Indonesia (formerly Irian Jaya)

Hibernating blogs

Indigenous Language SPEAK

Langguj gel Australian linguistics and fieldwork blog

Interesting Blogs

Omniglot Writing systems and languages of the world

LingFormant Linguistics news

Language hat Linguistics news and commentary

Jabal al-Lughat Linguistics news and commentary on a range of languages

Living languages Blog with news items and discussion of endangered languages

OzPapersOnline Notices of recent work on the Indigenous languages of Australia

That Munanga linguist Community linguist blog

Anggarrgoon Claire Bowern's linguistics and fieldwork blog

Savage Minds A group blog on Anthropology

Fully (sic)

Language on the Move Intercultural communication and multilingualism

Talking Alaska: Reflections on the native languages of Alaska

Culture matters: applying anthropology Australian anthropology blog: postgraduates and staff

Long Road ethnography and anthropology blog - including about Australia

matjjin-nehen Blog on Australian linguistics, fieldwork, politics and the environment.

Language Log Group blog on language and linguistics

Links

E-MELD The E-MELD School of Best Practices in Digital Language Documentation

Tema Modersmål Website in Swedish with links to sites on and in many languages

Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project: Language Documentation: What is it? Information on equipment, formats, and archiving, and examples of documentation

Indigenous Peoples Issues & Resources a worldwide network of organizations, academics, activists, indigenous groups, and others representing indigenous and tribal peoples

Technorati Profile

Technology-enhanced language revitalization Include ILAT (Indigenous Languages and Technology) discussion list.

Endangered languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia

Koryak Net Information on the people of Kamchatka

Linguistic fieldwork preparation: a guide for field linguists syllabi, funding, technology, ethics, readings, bibliography

On-line resources for endangered languages

Papua New Guinea Language Resources Phonologies, grammars, dictionaries, literacy, language maps for many PNG languages

Resource network for linguistic diversity Networking practitioners working to record,retrieve & reintroduce endangered languages

Projects

ACLA child language acquisition in three Australian Aboriginal communities

DELAMAN The Digital Endangered Languages and Musics Archives Network

PARADISEC The Pacific And Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures

Murriny-Patha Song Project Documenting the language and music of public songs and dances composed and performed by Murriny Patha-speaking people

PFED The Project for Free Electronic Dictionaries

DOBES Endangered language documentation and archiving, funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and sponsored by the Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen.

DELP Documenting endangered languages at the University of Sydney

Ethno EResearch Exploring methods and technology for streaming media and interlinear text