« Paradisec News and Repository Report | Blog home | Modern ways for ancient words - Nick Thieberger »

business learning training articles new learning business training opportunities finance learning training deposit money learning making training art loan learning training deposits make learning your training home good income learning outcome training issue medicine learning training drugs market learning money training trends self learning roof training repairing market learning training online secure skin learning training tools wedding learning training jewellery newspaper learning for training magazine geo learning training places business learning training design Car learning and training Jips production learning training business ladies learning cosmetics training sector sport learning and training fat burn vat learning insurance training price fitness learning training program furniture learning at training home which learning insurance training firms new learning devoloping training technology healthy learning training nutrition dress learning training up company learning training income insurance learning and training life dream learning training home create learning new training business individual learning loan training form cooking learning training ingredients which learning firms training is good choosing learning most training efficient business comment learning on training goods technology learning training business secret learning of training business company learning training redirects credits learning in training business guide learning for training business cheap learning insurance training tips selling learning training abroad protein learning training diets improve learning your training home security learning training importance

[Joint post by Peter K. Austin, Endangered Languages Academic Programme, SOAS and Jane Simpson]

There has been a flare up on the LINGTYP list again (cf. PKA's post last week) - this time from Gideon Goldenberg who suggested there is a distinction between research (good) and data collection (bad). He was writing about typological databases but it looks like the same opinion applies to documentary linguistic corpora - here's what he said:


"The clear and sharp distinction between research and materials is essential. The latter will be needed to illustrate scholarly discussion, but data themselves are not research even though they require thoughtful preparation. When electronic means became available there was the hope that from then on the mere accumulation of data would no longer be able to give credit of scientific work; it unfortunately turns to go the other way about. To share databases with others is OK and can be beneficial, but do not mistake it for research."


Ouch! All those digitised sound and video recordings with time-aligned multi-tier annotated corpora with linked metadata that we've been creating are fine and dandy, but it ain't research folks!

The real worry comes in the response from Nigel Vincent. He recently participated in a review of Dutch humanities research and it became clear to him that in the Netherlands basically the same position is taken by the NWO research council - only paper publications count. The UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) that will be on in earnest next year does recognise databases and electronic corpora as research outputs but exactly how that will play out when panels get down to bean counting for the RAE remains unclear.

Why should we worry? Because these reviews determine what money goes to research. If they decide our laboriously collected and analysed materials are not research, then we will not be funded to collect and prepare more of them, i.e. you'll get funded to do an analysis of some linguistic property of UgaBuga which will disappear with your theoretical framework, but you won't get funded to produce the material on UgaBuga which will allow future speakers and future linguists to hear the language and watch speech events with all the associated information about them.

As for how the Research Quality Framework newly introduced in Australia by DEST will treat what Goldberg calls "mere accumulation of data", well, linguists have made representations for acknowledging as research output documented and catalogued collection of field recordings of endangered speech varieties archived in public archives. But have they been accepted? Perhaps readers gearing up for the RQF would care to comment?

It's all a bit of a worry for those of us documenting endangered languages who need to get recognition and support from our academic colleagues, institutions and funding agencies. Especially for young researchers.

Comments

It *is* clearly research from the point of view of human subjects definitions. That's the first question they ask. If it's not research, then it doesn't have to be evaluated. The folklore people, for example, have successfully argued that what they do isn't research, the research is what they do on the materials once they've collected them. Some ethnographers argue the same. I disagree vehemently, as you can imagine. I'm trying to imagine the parallels in medical research - sorry, you can't do that thing with the petri dishes and the mice, because that's just data collection, not research?

Claire - if I understand your comment correctly, I think you are talking about research methods not outputs. Scientists don't produce collections of mice or petri dishes, rather they use them to make observations (measurements) which then form the basis for analysis and theory. The same parallel would hold in linguistics -- data collected from speakers then used to publish the 'real' research. The issue we are discussing here is the status of the 'observational data collection' part of our work - does it count as 'research' too?

But even in hard sciences the distinction between methods and outputs isn't always that clear. Sequencing the human genome, for example: that's "observation" in the sense you're talking about, and it's also the basis of analysis and theory. Or the case where someone comes up with a way to splice DNA - that's a "method" or technique, but it's still publishable and fundable because it allows all sorts of other work to get done.
Likewise, presumably these text collections and other observational data aren't ends in themselves, and we spend all that time creating Elan text tiers and so on in order to facilitate analysis, AND presumably when we do this we have something in mind that we want to study.

I agree - you cannot draw the line between data collection and research that easily. It doesn't work that way.

For example - I've spent the last oh, five years, working on collecting data (and I'm lucky in that I don't have to go into the field to get this! - I just get it off those who do).

If I didn't have that data, I wouldn't be able to do the research. It's that simple: you can't have one without the other.

--Simon

Simon,

Yes, but there's a push in lingustics for our data collection to be (much) greater in volume, for our data management to be much greater in sophistication and our return to the communities we work with to be equally volumnious and sophisticated. All of this is GREAT and there is now funding for these activities (yay ELDP and VW/DOBES), but they take a lot of time (in theory ok b/c of funding) which means less time for *research* output, where research is measured in traditional terms.

I like Michael Walsh's article from circa 2000 in ARAL (can't find a reference online cos can't get access to journal indexes from home), in which he argues for a paradigm shift in the way the work academic linguists do is 'measured.'

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Enter the code shown below before pressing post

The Authors

About the Blog

The Transient Building, symbolising the impermanence of language, houses both the Linguistics Department at Sydney University and PARADISEC, a digital archive for endangered Pacific languages and music.
More

FAQ

Papua New Guinea FAQs from Eva Lindstrom Papua New Guinea (New Ireland): Eva Lindstrom's tips for fieldworkers

Australian Languages Answers to some frequently asked questions about Australian languages

Papua Web Information network on Papua, Indonesia (formerly Irian Jaya)

Hibernating blogs

Indigenous Language SPEAK

Langguj gel Australian linguistics and fieldwork blog

Interesting Blogs

Omniglot Writing systems and languages of the world

LingFormant Linguistics news

Language hat Linguistics news and commentary

Jabal al-Lughat Linguistics news and commentary on a range of languages

Living languages Blog with news items and discussion of endangered languages

OzPapersOnline Notices of recent work on the Indigenous languages of Australia

That Munanga linguist Community linguist blog

Anggarrgoon Claire Bowern's linguistics and fieldwork blog

Savage Minds A group blog on Anthropology

Fully (sic)

Language on the Move Intercultural communication and multilingualism

Talking Alaska: Reflections on the native languages of Alaska

Culture matters: applying anthropology Australian anthropology blog: postgraduates and staff

Long Road ethnography and anthropology blog - including about Australia

matjjin-nehen Blog on Australian linguistics, fieldwork, politics and the environment.

Language Log Group blog on language and linguistics

Links

E-MELD The E-MELD School of Best Practices in Digital Language Documentation

Tema Modersmål Website in Swedish with links to sites on and in many languages

Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project: Language Documentation: What is it? Information on equipment, formats, and archiving, and examples of documentation

Indigenous Peoples Issues & Resources a worldwide network of organizations, academics, activists, indigenous groups, and others representing indigenous and tribal peoples

Technorati Profile

Technology-enhanced language revitalization Include ILAT (Indigenous Languages and Technology) discussion list.

Endangered languages of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia

Koryak Net Information on the people of Kamchatka

Linguistic fieldwork preparation: a guide for field linguists syllabi, funding, technology, ethics, readings, bibliography

On-line resources for endangered languages

Papua New Guinea Language Resources Phonologies, grammars, dictionaries, literacy, language maps for many PNG languages

Resource network for linguistic diversity Networking practitioners working to record,retrieve & reintroduce endangered languages

Projects

ACLA child language acquisition in three Australian Aboriginal communities

DELAMAN The Digital Endangered Languages and Musics Archives Network

PARADISEC The Pacific And Regional Archive for Digital Sources in Endangered Cultures

Murriny-Patha Song Project Documenting the language and music of public songs and dances composed and performed by Murriny Patha-speaking people

PFED The Project for Free Electronic Dictionaries

DOBES Endangered language documentation and archiving, funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and sponsored by the Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen.

DELP Documenting endangered languages at the University of Sydney

Ethno EResearch Exploring methods and technology for streaming media and interlinear text