« E-research for education: Some initial readings | Main | Research culture and e-research »

Recently (May 2007) the Australian Government accepted An Australian e-Research Strategy and Implementation Framework. This document outlines a general vision and strategic plan for the enhancement of e-research capacities in Australia over forthcoming five-year period. I think this document deserves some interest of academic research community too, particularly of those who work in education. This is my first thought about it.

Education for e-research

Overall, the Framework outlines 19 recommendations in 9 strategic areas. Eight of these recommendations are in the areas of "Skills development" and "Skills transfer". Some highlights from these recommendations:


  • Introduction of undergraduate cross-disciplinary ICT electives for career pathways to e-research;
  • Establishment of cross-disciplinary e-research Honours and Postgraduate scholarships (50 + 35 each year);
  • Postdoctoral and Pathway Fellowships for early and senior researchers from various disciplines;
  • Other smaller schemes for academics from various domains to enhance their expertise in e-research methodologies (e.g., teaching relief for 1 year);
  • Workshops, visiting fellowships for overseas researchers and other development opportunities for academics.

Thus, the forthcoming five years in the Australian e-research world probably could be called “Education for e-research”.

The implementation of these recommendations will primarily fell on IT faculties. Nevertheless, thinking about the future, other disciplines (including “soft”) will probably need to integrate the key aspects of e-research methods in their research programs too. Not the easy task for “soft” disciplines. Nevertheless, this could be a great opportunity to enhance social research, particularly in education. How? We will write about this in this blog in the future. Your ideas are welcome already now ;).

Comments

I see that James Dalzeil of LAMS fame is on the Reference Panel for the investment plan. Perhaps this will raise LAMS' profile as a platform for educational research? But what about other systems like BeeHive that occupy the same research space?

--Ron (MLS&T)

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)