« Big Brother | Main | Tip for Today »

OpenWetWare is, and I quote, an effort to promote the sharing of information, know-how, and wisdom among researchers and groups who are working in biology & biological engineering.

Essentially, it's a wiki for biological labs to share information. Think about it: An editable database of all your reagents, projects and protocols and all you need is a web browser.

The aims of the project are certainly laudable: OpenWetWare represents an initial effort to decentralize and lower the barriers to information exchange among all researchers, be they professors, students or research scientists.

This could be worthwhile, or it could be a tremendous waste of time. I'm not sure which at the moment, and it boils down to if it would take too much effort to convert everything we have in (e.g.) Filemaker databases and administer the thing.

Let's look around a little. By providing a common space for people to post information about their work, graduate students are more likely to be aware of the work going on in other labs locally. It seems like this will improve the likelihood of collaboration, and also a provide a source for finding out where certain expertise lies. Now that might be true, but it relies on a minimal number of 'local' labs actually getting involved. So you have to persuade them. And you have to persuade them to keep the information current. Conventional scientific networks are really quite extensive, and I'm not convinced that word of mouth is less effective at finding collaborators than trawling through nearly 3,000 web pages.

Currently there are ~15 labs on OWW, and they are involved with the project to varying degrees. A lab that I used to collaborate with seems to be taking it seriously, but are doing little more than mirroring the website hosted by their institute. It strikes me as a waste of potential to limit the application to being a central repository of reagent lists and plasmid maps. The critical thing is to get people exchanging ideas, not (just) protocols. A few years ago I tried to do something like this for a bunch of labs that shared a Human Frontier grant. I wrote the website and published it, but getting anyone else to contribute was a lost battle (despite promises at the meetings we held). I don't think having a wiki would have improved my chances.

So for the societal aspects, there are various fora and bulletin boards around the web that might fulfill the aims just as effectively. But I'm open to persuasion and am seriously tempted to punt the URL at the Boss and see what he says.

I'll say this though; OWW has entertainment value. Just clicking on random labs I've discovered that 'Tania' is responsible for fine chemicals and ordering computer programmes [sic] and that People that work with Radioactivity and have not filled a personal work permit form are not insured when working with P32 and are hence NOT allowed to do so. Does that information really need to be on the WWW?

What is it with capitals in the middle of names anyway? Not everything is an objectOrientedClassName.

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What a tangled WebWeWeave:

» Wikis -- the rant from The Daily Grind
Not sure if I've done this before, but if so I'm prompted to revisit it by Black Knight's post about... [Read More]

About the Rat

Black Knight is interested in the interaction of science (as a day job and as a way of thinking) with his family, the wider community and literature. And tormenting students. Frequently polemical, sometimes serious, and hopefully always entertaining more

blackasknight@gmail.com

Life

All your base are belong to us The BioLOG is back, bigger and bad to the bone

Ricardiblog But Canadians are such nice people

LabLit From the blurb: LabLit.com is dedicated to real laboratory culture and to the portrayal and perceptions of that culture – science, scientists and labs – in fiction, the media and across popular culture.

Humans in Science Similar to 'Lab Rats', a very human look at the process of doing science and how daily life impacts our profession

Media

The Daily Grind Jonathan Sanderson, a TV producer interested in making 'popular science' shows

Nuts and bolts

Life Science Tools of the Trade This collective webblog focuses on learning about, purchasing and using life science products and services.

Science

The Scientist Nonymous Noodlings at Nature

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2