The thing that makes a weblogger's cockles warm is feedback. We might know that people are reading us — I can look at the webserver stats and see all those lovely unique hits, you might bump into me on the stairs and say something nice — but what really gets the pulse going is comments. That someone has taken the time to prestidigitate the keycaps and share their ineffable thoughts on my humble weblog . . . it's better than drugs.
Trackbacks are good, but I'm not going to be greedy.
But throwing it open to all comers can cause problems. And, in theory at least, this particular weblog is under the auspices of the University of Sydney, which might inhibit some of you. And you have no idea what I think about comments or how I might decide what is suitable, because I haven't told you yet.
So, having read Georg's little spiel this evening I'm going to iterate my comments policy in the hope that maybe more people will feel able to natter away, and maybe we can get some good dialogue going.
Most of what follows is shamelessly nicked from the templatedata, and is aimed at protecting me as well as your rights to free speech (do we have such a thing in Australia? Or am I being seditious again?).
Comments Policy
- I intend to deal with comments in a very 'hands off' manner. If you've taken the time to say something, then I should do you the honour of allowing you to say it
- Comments will only be deleted in extreme cases and the author of such comments will be emailed with an explanation as to why this has occurred. Examples of extreme cases include personal abuse, foul language or possible defamatory material. If a person persists in posting inflammatory material they may be blocked from commenting. Please note this will occur in extreme cases only. The decision to block a commenter is at the discretion of the blog owner — i.e., me
- I reserve the right to edit for embarrassing spelling mistakes, or language that I deem offensive. I will endeavour to let the commenter know of such instances
- Those commenting are encouraged to supply a real email address. This address will not be published (I promise!) but used only in cases such as those mentioned above. If a commenter is found to continually supply a false email address they may be placed in a moderation list that will force all comments they make through moderation before being published. Anonymity is discouraged, although pseudonymity is fine.
- All comments are associated with an originating IP address. We don't do anything with this information, unless you're being a complete scumbag.
- There is no rule 6.
- Spam and commercial advertising will be dealt with without merce or ruth.
So, there. That's about it. There are many like it, but this one's mine.
And to get the ball rolling, how about a naming competition for the little fella (or lassie as she might turn out to be) in the new masthead up there? If that's successful we could do a caption contest too, and I'll buy the winner a prize (even if it is just a coffee at Azzurri's).
I know you're out there. I can hear you breathing.

Comments
How about 'Sidney'? It's gender-non-specific, a pun on your geographic location, and all I can think of.
Except 'Ratty', classic Wind In The Willows stuff.
P.S. Consider yourself fed back.
Posted by: Ricardipus | September 5, 2006 01:30 AM
P.P.S. Does your comments policy need a disclaimer that it is subject to USyd's rules about internet usage, yadda yadda yadda? Just wondering.
Posted by: Ricardipus, again | September 5, 2006 01:32 AM
'Sid' might work, but 'Ratty' has more character (although as you know scientists don't read much. . .)
WRT USyds rules about 'net resources, that's probably more for me than you lot. But thanks for the thought.
Posted by: BK | September 5, 2006 09:29 AM
There's always the cliched 'Basil'...
Posted by: Georg | September 5, 2006 09:59 AM
'He no rat, he hamster!'
Posted by: BK | September 5, 2006 10:05 AM
Oh yes, that's right. Still, won't let the facts spoil things...
Posted by: Georg | September 5, 2006 10:23 AM
i think it's a squirrel?? chipmunk even? so maybe alvin, theodore or...what was the other one's name? stephen?
that or call it beatrice! or petunia!
Posted by: procrastination queen | September 5, 2006 08:50 PM
It had better be a bloody rat, or Words Shall Be Had with the designer. . .
(and I'm pleased to say that although I know of Alvin & the chipmunks, that's the extent of my knowledge!)
Posted by: Black Knight | September 5, 2006 09:40 PM
I don't know what it is (though I did do the search looking for a rat pic for you.) but I swear it's giving me the death stare every time I come to the blog. Having the desired effect then.
Posted by: Georg | September 5, 2006 09:57 PM
Death stare?
Maybe that's something in your psyche, because the look he's giving me is far more "what the /heck/ is going on?".
Which is one of the reasons I liked this picture best.
Posted by: BK | September 6, 2006 09:16 AM
Names? I have always been a big fan of 'Bastard Kestrel'.
Posted by: Nigel | September 9, 2006 06:39 PM
You could always call him 'Ararat' if you like.
Or not.
Posted by: Da Whifflage | September 13, 2006 05:06 AM
Jack Kerorat.
Friend of mine had a rat called that once, but they die quickly and as far as I know the name's vacant.
Posted by: Zoe | September 18, 2006 04:13 PM
Bubo! ;)
oh, okay, I guess that's not very nice... what about Yersinia, after Yersinia Pestis, the bug that casued the Bubonic Plague? only if it's a girl rat, of course. Yersinia definitely sounds like a girls name.
or perhaps Auntie Hatty, Uncle Matty, Tatty or Baby Batty as a tribute to Spike Milligan by way of The Ratties?
I think I've thought of far too much dumb stuff now.
Posted by: worldpeace_and_aspeedboat | September 19, 2006 05:56 PM