« Dumb | Main | Bad to the Bone »

The Trees

18 October, 2007

Adapted from an email I've just sent to the Head:

This is beyond ludicrous. If we are each to have a copy of the OHS paperwork, the maths looks like this:

Say 6 risk assessments, 6 SOPs. 20 MSDS sheets, at an average of 5 pages each. Four pages of policy document. Call it 115 pieces of paper. Thirty people in our group. That's three and a half thousand pieces of paper - best part of 7 reams. That's nearly half a tree, plus the toner used.

And that's just one quarter? one third if we're generous of Level N. I really, really think that this needs a rethink.

Won't somebody, please, think of the trees?

Comments

We are suffering a similar regime here at UQ. There was a time when it was assumed that educated people possessed sufficient common sense to work safely. I suppose universities just have to cover themselves legally these days.

Anyway, as "lab computer guy", I'm often given the task of making this stuff less painful. If you don't have one yet, set up a lab wiki. Make everyone drop their risk assessments, SOPs, MSDSs and protocols into it. That way it's all stored and when required, you just retrieve a few PDFs and send them off.

There are more complex solutions (set up a database, write a LIMS...) but that's about the easiest.

And at the risk of plugging a structure I like, may I suggest setting up your lab wiki here? It's really very easy. I have to get back to mine, I tend to leave things unfinished, but the approach is a good one and you feel sort of like you're doing a good deed, somewhere.
http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/Labs

We did think about a lab wiki once. It would not address the OHS thing of course - we'd need to have all the pages and *still* have to print everything out.

Unless I can persuade the Powers to get away from this 'folder for everyone' nonsense and onto wikis. . . but as I said, we're talking about lawyers and administrators at University and government level who have no bloody idea about the practise of these things in reality.

Last message got swallowed somewhere - are you taking your revenge?

Just wanted to point you here:
http://www.openwetware.org/wiki/Labs

A folder, per person?!? What is it about paper that gives it such a priveleged status anyway? A copy (or several even) for the lab so that they are accessible if a computer is not but otherwise...

I am going to London next week, I shall attempt to find a gentleman on a Clapham Omnibus (might be a challenge in itself) to ask if this is reasonable.

Post a comment

Enter the code shown below before pressing post

About the Rat

Black Knight is interested in the interaction of science (as a day job and as a way of thinking) with his family, the wider community and literature. And tormenting students. Frequently polemical, sometimes serious, and hopefully always entertaining more

blackasknight@gmail.com

Life

All your base are belong to us The BioLOG is back, bigger and bad to the bone

Ricardiblog But Canadians are such nice people

LabLit From the blurb: LabLit.com is dedicated to real laboratory culture and to the portrayal and perceptions of that culture – science, scientists and labs – in fiction, the media and across popular culture.

Humans in Science Similar to 'Lab Rats', a very human look at the process of doing science and how daily life impacts our profession

Media

The Daily Grind Jonathan Sanderson, a TV producer interested in making 'popular science' shows

Nuts and bolts

Life Science Tools of the Trade This collective webblog focuses on learning about, purchasing and using life science products and services.

Science

The Scientist Nonymous Noodlings at Nature

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2