« It's nobody's fault but mine | Main | Smoke on the Water »

You see, this is why I hate the internets.

Just got back from a performance at the Pawns' school (Elder Pawn was first clarinet in a fantastic rendition of Pirates of the Caribbean) and am now supposed to be washing up, but I happened to stumble across Emma PeelTigtog's rant on paradigm shifts:

I’m not the only person to be annoyed over the years by the egregious overuse of the term “paradigm shift”. I knew people were misusing the term, but not having actually read Kuhn’s seminal work wherein he coined the term, I never had the properly grounded basis to articulate why.

"Paradigm shift" gets nearly fourteen hundred hits in PubMed. That's a lot of paradigms being overthrown. I really can't be arsed going through and thinking about which ones are really paradigms, but much like my own bugbear, "quantum leap" (111 hits in PubMed) — why people get so excited about the smallest possible discrete advance is beyond me —, I suspect that even (especially?) in the proper sciences the term is much abused.

I'd say more, but the suds are getting cold.

Comments

You need to blame pharma companies and the marketing agencies without the wit to stop them from falling into the trap of calling everything a bloody paradigm shift. The number of satellite symposia I have seen and, in some cases, had the misfortune to be associated with that profess a paradigm shift is simply staggering. Other overused phrases include:

New perspectives
Emerging trends
New horizons
Revolutionising
... and a whole truckload of colon separators.

Pressure comes in part from the need for Wall Street to see a 'blockbuster'. Blockbuster should mean blockbuster - that is a drug with truly colossal revenue potential. Unfortunately, the clots on Wall Street don't think they can deal in anything but the shares of companies that have a bollockbuster in their portfolio; so everyone hypes up their drugs to the same degree. And can these blockbusters shift paradigms? You bet your ass they can!

And can we see these blockbusters at the movies?

...and how about a prize for overuse of the word "egregious"...?

egre·gious
Pronunciation: \i-ˈgrē-jəs\
Function: adjective
Etymology: Latin egregius, from e- + greg-, grex herd — more at gregarious
Date: circa 1534
1archaic : distinguished
2: conspicuous; especially : conspicuously bad

Don't get a lot of play down around our parts.

Post a comment

Enter the code shown below before pressing post

About the Rat

Black Knight is interested in the interaction of science (as a day job and as a way of thinking) with his family, the wider community and literature. And tormenting students. Frequently polemical, sometimes serious, and hopefully always entertaining more

blackasknight@gmail.com

Life

All your base are belong to us The BioLOG is back, bigger and bad to the bone

Ricardiblog But Canadians are such nice people

LabLit From the blurb: LabLit.com is dedicated to real laboratory culture and to the portrayal and perceptions of that culture – science, scientists and labs – in fiction, the media and across popular culture.

Humans in Science Similar to 'Lab Rats', a very human look at the process of doing science and how daily life impacts our profession

Media

The Daily Grind Jonathan Sanderson, a TV producer interested in making 'popular science' shows

Nuts and bolts

Life Science Tools of the Trade This collective webblog focuses on learning about, purchasing and using life science products and services.

Science

The Scientist Nonymous Noodlings at Nature

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2