« Indian Summer | Main | Wikiworrying »

The write stuff

16 March, 2008

A post on how students (in general) can not write, and what we should do about it, obviously struck a few chords over at Nature Network. The discussion led Martin Fenner to create a new Nature Network group The Good Paper Journal Club, and inspired Henry Gee (Senior Editor, Biology, at Nature) to write that although Nature does not currently reject a paper solely because it is poorly written, this state of affairs conceivably might change.

It is true to say that most scientists have a difficult job communicating their results (in papers or seminars) to other scientists; their chances of communicating meaningfully with the general public are essentially nil (and even may be actively harmful).

In this context, I'd be interested to know what courses (in, say, writing clearly and giving a good seminar) are available to undergraduates (at USyd and elsewhere), and whether anyone actually found them helpful. We do our best to help our Honours students avoid the worst traps, but this kind of teaching needs to be formalized, needs to start early, and needs to be mandatory.

Comments

I know that in third and second year biochemistry subjects at USYD they have web links on how to write good reports.

http://www.mmb.usyd.edu.au/report/BCHM2/ http://www.mmb.usyd.edu.au/report/BCHM3/

Sydney University also has Write Site. A specially designed website to help students how to write properly.

http://writesite.elearn.usyd.edu.au/

On top of that, USYD has Learning Centre which runs formal classes on writing, giving presentation, critical reading etc. The classes are free. They have it during normal semesters and also during winter and summer semesters.

Having said all that, I must say I have never met an undergrad who cares or knows about it.

I think you've nailed it, PS: People don't go to that sort of thing voluntarily. It has to be part of the course, just like glycolysis.

(And I don't really have time right now to look in detail, but those links seem to be perpetuating the very styles we're complaining about, especially in respect to the passive voice).

Yea, you're right. I always think that it is the only way to write in science for some strange reasons. May be you should talk to Jill or Dale about those links.

Ha!! I had to snigger at your link for "harmful".

When I was a grad student at Berkeley, there were mandatory speaking seminars for us first-years. They were great. We had to give oral reports on each rotation project (the first trimester was devoted to the professors presenting their own topics) and give comments to one another. It was highly helpful.

Post a comment

Enter the code shown below before pressing post

About the Rat

Black Knight is interested in the interaction of science (as a day job and as a way of thinking) with his family, the wider community and literature. And tormenting students. Frequently polemical, sometimes serious, and hopefully always entertaining more

blackasknight@gmail.com

Life

All your base are belong to us The BioLOG is back, bigger and bad to the bone

Ricardiblog But Canadians are such nice people

LabLit From the blurb: LabLit.com is dedicated to real laboratory culture and to the portrayal and perceptions of that culture – science, scientists and labs – in fiction, the media and across popular culture.

Humans in Science Similar to 'Lab Rats', a very human look at the process of doing science and how daily life impacts our profession

Media

The Daily Grind Jonathan Sanderson, a TV producer interested in making 'popular science' shows

Nuts and bolts

Life Science Tools of the Trade This collective webblog focuses on learning about, purchasing and using life science products and services.

Science

The Scientist Nonymous Noodlings at Nature

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2