Main

ass.png

Wikiworrying

18 March, 2008

If the inestimable FSP gets annoyed with it, then I feel I'm in good company (passim).

Seriously, what is wrong with these people? Do they actually believe they're right? Why do they keep 'uncorrecting' things, and — most importantly — how do we know which articles are affected? After all, you don't go to an encyclopædia to discover stuff you already know.

I do like this idea:

Ideally, my students would be able to look at a flawed Wikipedia entry on a topic we have discussed in the course, and see the errors.

It's tempting to deliberately direct students to dodgy entries and see if they cotton on.

Muppetry

7 March, 2008

Everyone is visited by the F-Up Fairy, once in every while. And it happens to the best of us, including, I'm delighted to say, Nature's web team:

We have had a number of complaints regarding the Nature Register page. After some thorough investigation we are pleased to announce that the problems have now been rectified.

Please visit My Account <http://www.nature.com/nams/svc/myaccount>
where you can view your account and make adjustments accordingly.

If you would like to register with nature.com please click here:
Register <file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\r.raymond\My%20Documents\My%20Pictures>

R. Raymond must be feeling pretty silly.

"Oops".

Everybody hurts

24 October, 2007

Some people just don't get it.

A reader wrote to me, on the horrors of MSDS and risk assessments etc., and suggested I look at something called 'Chemwatch'.

So I looked at the website, and BANG! Browser window resize! Choice of flash or non-flash! Eye-hurting design!

Wake up guys. That stuff is sooo last millennium. And because of it, I really can't be arsed.

Picture this

29 August, 2007

What's wrong with this picture?

moon.jpg

Here's the full text from the University's website, accompanying the single image:

Physicist Laszlo L Kiss last night captured these stunning images of the lunar eclipse.

The eclipse began at 6.51, when the earth's shadow made its way slowly across the moon and reached a climax at 7.52, when the moon was entirely engulfed by the earth's shadow.

During the eclipse, the moon appeared to be red, as light from the earth's atmosphere passed through it.
Lunar eclipses occur twice a year when the moon partially disappears as the earth shadows it.

Sometimes, I despair.

About the Rat

Black Knight is interested in the interaction of science (as a day job and as a way of thinking) with his family, the wider community and literature. And tormenting students. Frequently polemical, sometimes serious, and hopefully always entertaining more

blackasknight@gmail.com

Life

All your base are belong to us The BioLOG is back, bigger and bad to the bone

Ricardiblog But Canadians are such nice people

LabLit From the blurb: LabLit.com is dedicated to real laboratory culture and to the portrayal and perceptions of that culture – science, scientists and labs – in fiction, the media and across popular culture.

Humans in Science Similar to 'Lab Rats', a very human look at the process of doing science and how daily life impacts our profession

Media

The Daily Grind Jonathan Sanderson, a TV producer interested in making 'popular science' shows

Nuts and bolts

Life Science Tools of the Trade This collective webblog focuses on learning about, purchasing and using life science products and services.

Science

The Scientist Nonymous Noodlings at Nature

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2