
If the inestimable FSP gets annoyed with it, then I feel I'm in good company (passim).
Seriously, what is wrong with these people? Do they actually believe they're right? Why do they keep 'uncorrecting' things, and — most importantly — how do we know which articles are affected? After all, you don't go to an encyclopædia to discover stuff you already know.
I do like this idea:
Ideally, my students would be able to look at a flawed Wikipedia entry on a topic we have discussed in the course, and see the errors.
It's tempting to deliberately direct students to dodgy entries and see if they cotton on.
Everyone is visited by the F-Up Fairy, once in every while. And it happens to the best of us, including, I'm delighted to say, Nature's web team:
We have had a number of complaints regarding the Nature Register page. After some thorough investigation we are pleased to announce that the problems have now been rectified.Please visit My Account <http://www.nature.com/nams/svc/myaccount>
where you can view your account and make adjustments accordingly.If you would like to register with nature.com please click here:
Register <file:///C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\r.raymond\My%20Documents\My%20Pictures>
R. Raymond must be feeling pretty silly.
"Oops".
Some people just don't get it.
A reader wrote to me, on the horrors of MSDS and risk assessments etc., and suggested I look at something called 'Chemwatch'.
So I looked at the website, and BANG! Browser window resize! Choice of flash or non-flash! Eye-hurting design!
Wake up guys. That stuff is sooo last millennium. And because of it, I really can't be arsed.
What's wrong with this picture?

Here's the full text from the University's website, accompanying the single image:
Physicist Laszlo L Kiss last night captured these stunning images of the lunar eclipse.The eclipse began at 6.51, when the earth's shadow made its way slowly across the moon and reached a climax at 7.52, when the moon was entirely engulfed by the earth's shadow.
During the eclipse, the moon appeared to be red, as light from the earth's atmosphere passed through it.
Lunar eclipses occur twice a year when the moon partially disappears as the earth shadows it.
Sometimes, I despair.
About the Rat
blackasknight@gmail.com
Search
Categories
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
Life
All your base are belong to us
The BioLOG is back, bigger and bad to the bone
Ricardiblog
But Canadians are such nice people
LabLit
From the blurb: LabLit.com is dedicated to real laboratory culture and to the portrayal and perceptions of that culture – science, scientists and labs – in fiction, the media and across popular culture.
Humans in Science
Similar to 'Lab Rats', a very human look at the process of doing science and how daily life impacts our profession
Media
The Daily Grind
Jonathan Sanderson, a TV producer interested in making 'popular science' shows
Nuts and bolts
Life Science Tools of the Trade
This collective webblog focuses on learning about, purchasing and using life science products and services.
Science
The Scientist
Nonymous Noodlings at Nature
Movable Type 3.2
