« Burqa bans and religion as 'being-in-the-world' | Blog home | The Word That Dares Not Speak Its Name: Sexuality, Space and the Chinese Other »

business learning training articles new learning business training opportunities finance learning training deposit money learning making training art loan learning training deposits make learning your training home good income learning outcome training issue medicine learning training drugs market learning money training trends self learning roof training repairing market learning training online secure skin learning training tools wedding learning training jewellery newspaper learning for training magazine geo learning training places business learning training design Car learning and training Jips production learning training business ladies learning cosmetics training sector sport learning and training fat burn vat learning insurance training price fitness learning training program furniture learning at training home which learning insurance training firms new learning devoloping training technology healthy learning training nutrition dress learning training up company learning training income insurance learning and training life dream learning training home create learning new training business individual learning loan training form cooking learning training ingredients which learning firms training is good choosing learning most training efficient business comment learning on training goods technology learning training business secret learning of training business company learning training redirects credits learning in training business guide learning for training business cheap learning insurance training tips selling learning training abroad protein learning training diets improve learning your training home security learning training importance

A fair go?

21 Jul

The Federal election has been called and the message from both sides is a commitment to ‘a fair go for all Australians’. When it comes to election messaging, this slogan is quite clichéd, however, the ‘fair go’ sentiment is likely to carry significant voting currency in the upcoming Federal election.

Yet, for many in the gay and lesbian community, a ‘fair go’ remains a distant reality. So, with ongoing sexuality-based discrimination, is the ‘fair go’ ever going to be extended to all Australians?

Australia has approached protecting the rights of sexual minorities rather haphazardly over the past few decades. Each state and territory in Australia has established anti-discrimination laws which protect against some forms of sexuality discrimination.

However, legislative terminology is not consistent. It ranges from ‘sexuality’ or ‘sexual orientation’ in other Australian states to ‘homosexuality’ as it is defined in NSW. While terminology may seem a semantic point, the consequences of word choice are important. For a bisexual woman harassed and vilified in a NSW workplace for being a ‘confused lezzo’, the anti-discrimination protection of ‘homosexuality’ does not necessarily extend to bisexuals.

Equality before the law and the right to non-discrimination are well established principles in the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Australia currently has federal legislation which protects against discrimination on the grounds of sex, race, disability and age. However, sexuality or gender identity is a problematic omission.

While the Australian Government’s broad rhetorical claims to improve the human rights culture seems promising, this rhetoric is not a substitute for concrete rights protection. Words will not serve the best interests of an elderly same-sex couple, forced to live separately in a nursing home because of their non-heterosexual relationship status.

With continued political and cultural dogma that promotes the idea that gay and lesbian individuals are ‘threatening’ to society, anti-discrimination legislation is not simply advantageous - it is essential. Introducing sexuality anti-discrimination legislation would send a strong social message that these forms of discrimination are not acceptable in any context.

So as Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard prepare to wage an electoral war over who can deliver the ‘fair go’ to the Australian public, the question remains - will either support tangible legislative protections against unfair discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity?

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Enter the code shown below before pressing post

About the Blog

This is the blog for thinking and talking about culture, Cultural Studies and cultural analysis at the University of Sydney.