business learning training articles new learning business training opportunities finance learning training deposit money learning making training art loan learning training deposits make learning your training home good income learning outcome training issue medicine learning training drugs market learning money training trends self learning roof training repairing market learning training online secure skin learning training tools wedding learning training jewellery newspaper learning for training magazine geo learning training places business learning training design Car learning and training Jips production learning training business ladies learning cosmetics training sector sport learning and training fat burn vat learning insurance training price fitness learning training program furniture learning at training home which learning insurance training firms new learning devoloping training technology healthy learning training nutrition dress learning training up company learning training income insurance learning and training life dream learning training home create learning new training business individual learning loan training form cooking learning training ingredients which learning firms training is good choosing learning most training efficient business comment learning on training goods technology learning training business secret learning of training business company learning training redirects credits learning in training business guide learning for training business cheap learning insurance training tips selling learning training abroad protein learning training diets improve learning your training home security learning training importance

Blog home

thinking identity

This blog post is an immediate reflection on the banning of the burqa and niqab in public by the French Assemblée nationale in the wake of similar legislation in Belgium. I neither intend (in a blog post!) to justify or condemn the ban, premised as such dichotomies often are on unexamined presuppositions of what constitutes “freedom” and “oppression”, nor canvass the different material conditions, modes of being and subjectivity that may render the wearing of a veil acceptable or unacceptable in public. Drawing on the recent events in Europe as a starting point, what I do want to do is to take one step further 'back' in order to bring to the fore the presuppositions that are latent in a certain construal of that domain we have come to know as religion and/or ‘the religious’.

1 comments |

Guest post by Jacinthe Flore

The peculiar experience of growing up in a postcolonial island ties you forever to your place of birth. The place where I am born holds an almost mystical, if not obsessive, fascination. I cannot stand by without some form of reaction to the ongoing political change in Mauritius. So, following Melissa’s suggestion, I ‘write it out of my system’.

Blok 104

Since independence in 1968, the Mauritian ‘Nomination Paper’ – the form used to be considered as a political candidate – includes a field where you have to specify your ‘community’. These four communities are Chinese, Muslim, Hindu and General Population. A distinct group of Mauritian civil society have ingeniously figured out that if any significant change is to take place in the country, this very practice needs to be changed.

The ‘Blok 104’, named after the 104 candidates that refused to specify their community, and whose demand to be considered candidates was denied by the Supreme Court, is composed of social and political activists, ‘intellectuals’ and youth platforms. This political activism is a very powerful tool, and represents a genuine and growing concern that (certain) Mauritians have for the future of their country. This leads to an incredibly ambitious goal: the modification of the Constitution.

3 comments |

About the Blog

This is the blog for thinking and talking about culture, Cultural Studies and cultural analysis at the University of Sydney.